THE TICKER · HEAD-TO-HEAD · CHECKED DAILY · LAST CHANGE 2026-11-10
CLAUDE FABLE 5.2 VS GEMINI 3.5 FLASH LITE
Anthropic vs Google, in USD per million tokens, cross-checked daily against the public pricing dataset. Same jobs, both meters running.
Claude Fable 5.2 costs 16.4x more than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for the same job — a 1,000-token prompt with a 3,000-token reply runs $0.13 vs $0.0078. At 1,000 runs a day, that gap is $3,606.00 a month for identical traffic.
SIDE BY SIDE
| Claude Fable 5.2 → | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite → | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | |
| Input / MTok | $8.00 | $0.300 |
| Output / MTok | $40.00 | $2.50 |
| Output multiple | 5.0x | 8.3x |
| 1K prompt + 3K reply | $0.13 | $0.0078 |
SAME JOB, BOTH BILLS
| Scenario | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| A typical prompt | $0.04 | $0.0023 | 16.4x |
| A 20-turn conversation | $0.19 | $0.01 | 17.1x |
| Summarizing a 10-page document | $0.19 | $0.01 | 18.5x |
| One agent run | $0.50 | $0.03 | 16.2x |
| A code review request | $0.16 | $0.0098 | 16.5x |
Output sizes use the same editorial ratios as the Burn Calculator. Estimates, not invoices — and price is not a benchmark: the cheaper model is only a bargain if it does the job.
SETTLE IT WITH YOUR OWN PROMPT
Paste a real prompt into the Burn Calculator and see what it costs on Claude Fable 5.2, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and the other 40 models on the board — plus how much of it is waste either way.