THE TICKER · HEAD-TO-HEAD · CHECKED DAILY · LAST CHANGE 2026-08-14
CLAUDE FABLE 5 VS GPT-5.6 LUNA
Anthropic vs OpenAI, in USD per million tokens, cross-checked daily against the public pricing dataset. Same jobs, both meters running.
Claude Fable 5 costs 42.1x more than GPT-5.6 Luna for the same job — a 1,000-token prompt with a 3,000-token reply runs $0.16 vs $0.0038. At 1,000 runs a day, that gap is $4,686.00 a month for identical traffic.
SIDE BY SIDE
| Claude Fable 5 → | GPT-5.6 Luna → | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Input / MTok | $10.00 | $0.200 |
| Output / MTok | $50.00 | $1.20 |
| Output multiple | 5.0x | 6.0x |
| 1K prompt + 3K reply | $0.16 | $0.0038 |
SAME JOB, BOTH BILLS
| Scenario | Claude Fable 5 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| A typical prompt | $0.05 | $0.0011 | 42.1x |
| A 20-turn conversation | $0.24 | $0.0056 | 42.9x |
| Summarizing a 10-page document | $0.24 | $0.0054 | 44.1x |
| One agent run | $0.62 | $0.01 | 41.9x |
| A code review request | $0.20 | $0.0048 | 42.2x |
Output sizes use the same editorial ratios as the Burn Calculator. Estimates, not invoices — and price is not a benchmark: the cheaper model is only a bargain if it does the job.
SETTLE IT WITH YOUR OWN PROMPT
Paste a real prompt into the Burn Calculator and see what it costs on Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.6 Luna and the other 18 models on the board — plus how much of it is waste either way.