THE TICKER · HEAD-TO-HEAD · CHECKED DAILY · LAST CHANGE 2026-10-13
GPT-5.6 VS MUSE WONDER
OpenAI vs Meta, in USD per million tokens, cross-checked daily against the public pricing dataset. Same jobs, both meters running.
THE VERDICT
1.0x
Effectively a tie: for the same job (a 1,000-token prompt with a 3,000-token reply), GPT-5.6 and Muse Wonder bill within 5% of each other. Pick on quality, latency or taste — price won't settle this one.
SIDE BY SIDE
| GPT-5.6 → | Muse Wonder → | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | OpenAI | Meta |
| Input / MTok | $4.00 | $4.00 |
| Output / MTok | $20.00 | $20.00 |
| Output multiple | 5.0x | 5.0x |
| 1K prompt + 3K reply | $0.06 | $0.06 |
SAME JOB, BOTH BILLS
| Scenario | GPT-5.6 | Muse Wonder | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| A typical prompt | $0.02 | $0.02 | — |
| A 20-turn conversation | $0.10 | $0.10 | — |
| Summarizing a 10-page document | $0.10 | $0.10 | — |
| One agent run | $0.25 | $0.25 | — |
| A code review request | $0.08 | $0.08 | — |
Output sizes use the same editorial ratios as the Burn Calculator. Estimates, not invoices — and price is not a benchmark: the cheaper model is only a bargain if it does the job.
SETTLE IT WITH YOUR OWN PROMPT
Paste a real prompt into the Burn Calculator and see what it costs on GPT-5.6, Muse Wonder and the other 34 models on the board — plus how much of it is waste either way.