THE TICKER · HEAD-TO-HEAD · CHECKED DAILY · LAST CHANGE 2026-10-13
DEEPSEEK V4.1 FLASH VS GLM 5.3 FLASH
DeepSeek vs Z.ai, in USD per million tokens, cross-checked daily against the public pricing dataset. Same jobs, both meters running.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 1.2x more than GLM 5.3 Flash for the same job — a 1,000-token prompt with a 3,000-token reply runs $0.0019 vs $0.0016. At 1,000 runs a day, that gap is $9.00 a month for identical traffic.
SIDE BY SIDE
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash → | GLM 5.3 Flash → | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Input / MTok | $0.150 | $0.150 |
| Output / MTok | $0.600 | $0.500 |
| Output multiple | 4.0x | 3.3x |
| 1K prompt + 3K reply | $0.0019 | $0.0016 |
SAME JOB, BOTH BILLS
| Scenario | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 5.3 Flash | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| A typical prompt | $0.0006 | $0.0005 | 1.2x |
| A 20-turn conversation | $0.0030 | $0.0026 | 1.2x |
| Summarizing a 10-page document | $0.0031 | $0.0028 | 1.1x |
| One agent run | $0.0075 | $0.0063 | 1.2x |
| A code review request | $0.0025 | $0.0021 | 1.2x |
Output sizes use the same editorial ratios as the Burn Calculator. Estimates, not invoices — and price is not a benchmark: the cheaper model is only a bargain if it does the job.
SETTLE IT WITH YOUR OWN PROMPT
Paste a real prompt into the Burn Calculator and see what it costs on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash and the other 34 models on the board — plus how much of it is waste either way.